Whether the 5th Circuit can ignore 28 USC 2111 final judgment and review mandates after an 8-year dormant case period, and whether a U.S. Attorney must be a constitutionally appointed officer to prosecute a criminal claim

No question identified. : ISSUE(S) PRESENTED 1) Can the 5" Circuit, ignore the 28 USC 2111 final judgment and review mandates, and allow a case to lay dormant for over 8 years? If so, this negatively affects the national public interest to a legislative right of reviewing. 2) Does the United States Attorney (for his district) have to be the Officer Appointed under the Constitution, in order the lawfully lead the prosecution of a Government criminal claim? (28 USCS 547(1)) 3) Is the Petitioner entitled to Supreme Court approved counsel, in representing him under 18 USCS 3006A(c), as this is a continuation of his unresolved Appeals case? , , .