No. 24-6120

Leprinceton Dewon Burks v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-12-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court legal-theory mandatory-findings rule-12d
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-01-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure mandates essential findings by district courts and requires appellate remand when findings are not made

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. Whether a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 12(d) requirement that a district court deciding a motion must state its essential findings is mandatory and cannot be waived by a defendant’s failure to affirmatively request findings, so a court of appeals must remand when a district court fails to comply with the requirement. B. — Assuming arguendo that remand is not always required, whether it is required when the government argues two legal theories that depend on different facts and the district court did not indicate which legal theory it relied on. i

Docket Entries

2025-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025.
2024-12-30
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2025)

Attorneys

Leprinceton Burks
Carlton Frederick Gunn — Petitioner
Carlton Frederick Gunn — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent