Whether the Court of Appeals violated the Whistleblower Protection Enforcement Act by improperly dismissing a whistleblower's claims of retaliation and adverse employment actions

No question identified. : QUESTION #1: An important federal question of National Importance of whether The United States COURT OF APPEALS (COA) for the Federal Circuit, VIOLATED The Whistleblower Protection Enforcement Act (WPA/WPEA) under U.S.C Chapter 23, and U.S.C. 1221; when the COURT OF APPEALS (COA) had AUTHORITY and JURISDICTION to ADDRESS & CORRECT an Issue and claim of a 714 FIRED Whistleblower in consolidated cases #22-1844, #23-1311, #23-1204, of the UNLAWFUL Prohibited Personnel Practice (PPP) Adverse Action after the COA found the AIB Investigation retaliatory and the Third Retaliatory Reassignment Ms. Doyle was fired from, on Sept. 20, 2018. QUESTION #I1A: I look to the U.S. Supreme Court on this IMPORTANT federal question under The Whistleblower Protection Enforcement Act. (WPA/WPEA) and BEST INTEREST of the PUBLIC EYE, to address the CONFLICTING and INCONSISTENT, Narrow Review Dismissed Decision against a FIRED WHISTLEBLOWER, who was NOT PROTECTED in the found to be Retaliatory THIRD REASSIGNMNET, In the eye of the Public, they only see the Whistleblower being held Accountable. QUESTION #1B: Whether The COA Violated the Law & Discretion under The Whistleblower Protection Enforcement Act. (WPA/WPEA) to NOT Review or address, Ms. Doyle’s statement claims in 22-1844 of her filing appeal case : 2 #19-1786, when Ms. Doyle used the WORD “DISCRIMINATE” to describe the Retaliatory “FIRED ADVERSE ACTION” from QUESTION #1C: Whether the COA Violated & Failed, its Authority of Judicial review under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A)(b), 5 U.S.C.1201, and. THE WPA/WPEA ACT, to address, answer, and hold Accountability the multiple un-ethical, illegal, intentional & deliberate actions from a Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Syska, against a KNOWN Whistleblower. Presented to the COA in Case #23-1204: Doc.#26, Ms. Doyle made Non-Frivolous allegations & presented abundance of evidence of contradictions of LAW, from ALJ Syska whom DECONSOLIDATED and REMOVED, the Prohibited Personnel Practice (PPP) “FIRED” ADVERSE ACTION out of Ms. Doyle’s current docketed HIGH MERIT Whistleblower QUESTION 2: Whether the COA Violates the WPA/WPEA law, in a decision statement that contradicts the claims & evidence, ignoring claims and evidence to the Retaliatory Animus and Actions, to the Ultimate Goal of Denis Sullivan’s planned Agenda for an Instant Termination of a Whistleblower by forcing Ms. Doyle into the AMSA position. QUESTION 2A: Whether The United States COURT OF APPEALS violated the law, ignored, denied & failed to properly address and answer Ms. Doyle’s VALID claims under title 5 U.S.C. “Failure To Promote” 3 ; and “Denied an Appointment” due to Ms. Doyle’s disclosure and protected activity. Ms. Doyle applied also under Schedule A, “Individuals with Disabilities” : making her eligible to jump grades. MSPB, never told Ms. Doyle, she needed to submit more information, than the abundance she had. Evidence, submitted on . . Appeal to the COA by Ms. Doyle: , #22-1844 Doc#11-4 pg.1. “Notice of Results” for GS13 Executive Assistant Position due to the MSPB statement below: . MSPB decision stated: “moreover, she has not provided any evidence the agency , failed to select her for a higher graded position, as a result of the Prohibited ! personnel; Practices found in the underlying appeal.” . QUESTION 2B: Whether the COA violated & failed to address under the WPA/WPEA, and 5 U.S.C. § 1221(a)and failed to address or answered, Ms. Doyle’s Claims under the WPA/WPEA Law request of Reinstatement of a Whistleblower: #22-1844 doc.#11-2 Pg.16. Ms. Doyle’s Claims to be RETURNED/PLACED back into her Government career in as nearly as possible, the position the individual WOULD HAVE, had THE “Failure To Promote” prohibited personnel practice , NOT OCCURRED: HENCE the COA’s decision statement of Ms. Doyle’s Claim. : COA’s decision statement: Pg.7: “Ms. Doyle also sought promotion to a GS-13 . position as a form of consequential d