No. 24-6129

In Re Jason Clark

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-12-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: article-ii categorical-approach federal-prosecution mandamus-writ sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a categorical approach to sentencing enhancement under 18 USCS 924 can be denied based on United States v. Taylor, and whether a federal prosecution can proceed through an assistant while maintaining constitutional and statutory requirements

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : ISSUE(S) PRESENTED 1) Can Petitioner be denied Categorical approach relief on his 18 USCS 924, enhanced sentence, under United States v. Taylor? 2) Can the US Attomey proceed in prosecution thru an ‘assistant’, and maintain adherence to Article II, sec. II, cl. I and 28 USC 547(1) requirements? 3) Can a State Case, simply “become federally prosecutable”, without any evidentiary legal harm committed against the United States? ~~ C

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2024-12-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-22
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 13, 2025)

Attorneys

Clark, In Re Jason
Jason Clark — Petitioner
Jason Clark — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent