Should a court of appeals be summarily reversed for defying clear Supreme Court precedent, and should a judge or jury determine whether public employee speech is within ordinary job duties for First Amendment protection purposes?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Should this Court summarily reverse when a court of appeals defies clear, unmistakable decisions of this Court? 2. Should a judge or a jury decide whether a public employee’s speech is pursuant to his ordinary job duties, such that the speech is not protected by the First Amendment?