No. 24-6132
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-violation criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ninth-circuit successive-petition
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Thatcher's actual innocence and constitutional violations require vacatur of his petition and whether the Ninth Circuit's refusal to grant his Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive Habeas Petition was warranted
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Mr. Thatcher’s actual innocence and the constitutional violations taking place at his trial require the vacatur of his petition. 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal’s refusal to grant Mr. Thatcher’s Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive Habeas Petition was warranted. i
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-05
Attorneys
David Thatcher
Andrea Renee St. Julian — Law Office of Andrea Renee St. Julian, Petitioner