Whether the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when he was denied access to court-appointed counsel before his sentencing hearing

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . \. WHeriler Me.Lavol WAS REWED INS Roly To ThE ERoTECXION AGAINST Doug Jeotrey i Vidlkvion oF The Fieri AWEND MENT, Wien KFTER We GEG Seante Ws Sentence a We THE ORG SENTENCE, A REW AND INCREASED SEWTENCE.1S HPOSED. 2. Wllethen maLavell Wis DEwver Ws Gell To whe ASASTANCE oF GONSel. IN Violktion oF The Sua ANENDIENT, When whe © OvET Fale To INFORM. Wun OF is RAGIST “yo Counsel O& To ARROyw Counsel BEFORE A NeW AWD INCRERNSED SEHTENCE WAS \mgasen, 3. WllerWen Me.Lavoll WAS DEMED WS RGMT To WE O—LESS — WW Niolarvont OF We Fousreent\ Amenpinens, When whe CoVAT DEWen \ho EQVEST Yor ARowTeD Counsel AY Ws PAA‘ Revie ColbnTERAL CQRoceEDiNc, ANID Wile i FAleD To AQT COUNSE) BEFORE THE NEW AND INCRERSED SENTENCE WHS \NROSED.