Whether a federal district court's denial of a habeas petition based on procedural grounds constitutes a violation of the defendant's constitutional rights when evidence potentially exculpatory was not fully considered

Questions Presented statement, counsels’ fa'lare te object to ct, rd the nnagnitde ef the presteuwtorial misconduct in the ___ opening statement ofa defendants tial cequices that ther Conviction be vacated, In essence, iC the edidence ts SufV Move atl, steong, de defend. ants havea ta) kt-to ati Frial z Th What dees the Court consider averwhelaning evidence ar st Peieatly strong evidence? ——IL.__whether the tang of the. challenged comments establishes _thata deRndantsuficed WM Whether, Appellate. Couct_erted 'n_ceve (sing the. Visteet __“the__ statement of ony quest OnE presented (T-TD) 's_ vem d_te amples every subsiding question Lacly ine uded. TACLE iA, Petitian i's granted, due tothe im pertanee.of th e_factual_issues, Meets respecHliallg _ requests for _oral_acguments pefere t's Mrorable Court