No. 24-6156
Cenious Brewster v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-appeal judicial-discretion ninth-circuit presumption-of-reasonableness sentencing-commission sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in creating a 'presumption of reasonableness' for Judiciary Sentencing Information (JSIN) data from the United States Sentencing Commission
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it created an unprecedented “presumption of reasonableness” for “Judiciary Sentencing INformation” (“JSIN”) data from the United States Sentencing Commission? i
Docket Entries
2025-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025.
2024-12-31
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-12-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2025)
Attorneys
Cenious Brewster
Steven Garyh Kalar — Kalar Law Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent