No. 24-6159
Kevin Underwood v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, et al.
IFP
Tags: arbitrary-action clemency-proceedings constitutional-rights due-process procedural-fairness state-law
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the due process clause provides any protection for petitioners in state clemency proceedings that are explicitly required by state law
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the due process clause provides any protection for petitioners in state clemency proceedings that are explicitly required by state law. i
Docket Entries
2024-12-19
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-19
Application (24A590) referred to the Court.
2024-12-19
Application (24A590) for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Kavanaugh and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this application and this petition.
2024-12-18
Brief of Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, et al. in opposition submitted.
2024-12-18
Reply of Kevin Underwood submitted.
2024-12-18
Brief of respondent Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-12-18
Reply of petitioner Kevin Underwood filed.
2024-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
2024-12-17
Application (24A590) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh. (Justice Gorsuch is recused).
Attorneys
Kevin Underwood
Emma Victoria Rolls — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, et al.
Zachary Paul West — Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General, Respondent