Did the Fifth Circuit err in denying Escobedo's constitutional rights and ineffective assistance of counsel claims?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , Mr. Escobedo prose alleged the denial o€ Whe Full panoply proxections afforded by me tonstitotion vin particulate the denial to Ssittn amenaw ent ronstitutional vight tu are 4n al and Impartial Vury . substuntiat due process of Ane four teenth amendments and St¥rh amendment etkectine assis — +anee OF TouUnsel Guaranteed tight Wr. Escowedo was also subjected to double Seopary wrolations, the Fitth titturt denied Eseohedd a COAL the case Thus presents the following questions. 1, Did the Fikth ciecuit ere by misapplication ef te LOA Standatda of reAigWP 2. Did the Fi€th circuit ere by dening Estohedo a CoA? | a. Did Nir. Escobedo make & substantial snowing of the clental of a constitutional right warranting a COR? 4. Did the FAM citccuit ect by failing to apply the“ look | *nrew oroeess” foc Ane Amended Tadicrment and Motion to Quash the indictment? bid Escobedo ceclue