No. 24-6161
Leonard Hatten, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: co-defendant-comparison criminal-sentencing federal-sentencing-guidelines judicial-discretion reasonableness-review sentencing-disparity
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2025-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the sentence of the Defendant unreasonable due to unwarranted sentencing disparities among co-defendants?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Was the sentence of the Defendant unreasonable because it resulted in unwarranted sentencing disparities among his co-defendants? 1
Docket Entries
2025-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025.
2024-12-31
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-12-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2025)
Attorneys
Leonard Hatten, Jr.
Dana C. Bradford III — Houghton Bradford Whitted PC, LLO, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent