Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in not applying Schulp v. Del© precedent and denying petitioner's actual innocence gateway claim despite compelling new evidence

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 2. DIB THE MAJORITY BELOW ERROR IN NOT APPLYING ‘THIS, COURT'S DECISION IN SCHULP. V. BELO, TO HOLD THAT PETITIONER COMPELLING NEW EVIBENCE, THAT PRESENTS A COLORABLE CLAIM ‘OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE, CREATE TWO CONFLICTS OF LYW, BY THE PANEL'S IMBGSSIBLE "ACTUAL -INNOCENCE” STANBARD? . 2. BIB THE SIX CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERROR WHEN THEY DID NOT “ BROVIBE A HEARENG EN BANG, WHEN A PANEL OF TWO OF THREE JUBGES RULED CONTRARY TO UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT LAW, ESTA. BLISHING NEW LAW, DENYING MR. HUBBARD'S ACTUAL INN@CENCE GA* | TEWAY CLAIM? . ” J fi :