No. 24-6186
Vicente Alejo Andres, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law cruel-and-unusual-punishment drug-trafficking firearm-possession sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Punishment
Punishment
Latest Conference:
2025-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether mere possession of a firearm in the same location as drug trafficking constitutes possession 'in furtherance of' a drug offense under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and whether a de facto life sentence for nonviolent drug trafficking violates the Eighth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. When a defendant sells drugs from his house at the same time he has a firearm in his house, is that enough to prove that he possessed the firearm “in furtherance of” a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)? 2. Is de facto life imprisonment for nonviolent drug trafficking crimes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment? i
Docket Entries
2025-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025.
2025-01-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 21, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Vicente Alejo Andres, Jr., et al.
John Edward Davidson — Davidson & Kitzmann, PLC, Petitioner