No. 24-6188
John Earl Broomfield, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 911-call anonymous-tip fourth-amendment law-enforcement reasonable-suspicion supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2025-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 911 callers were 'anonymous' and if their identification conflicts with Florida v. J.L. precedent
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether the 911 callers in this matter were “anonymous” callers, and, if so, was the opinion in this matter then in conflict with Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000). ij
Docket Entries
2025-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025.
2025-01-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2025)
Attorneys
John Earl Broomfield Jr.
Joseph Edwin Kuehl — Lefler, Kuehl, and Burns, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent