No. 24-6190
Jacobie Travinski Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-interference criminal-law judicial-procedure perjury sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2025-01-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the three-level adjustment in U.S.S.G. §2J1.3(b)(2) require more than the initial perjury to constitute a "substantial interference with the administration of justice"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the three-level adjustment in U.S.S.G. §2J1.3(b)(2) require more than the initial perjury to constitute a 'substantial interference with the administration of justice'?
Docket Entries
2025-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025.
2025-01-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2025)
Attorneys
Jacobie Travinski Johnson
Thomas S. Berg — Moreno Gracia & Berg, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent