No. 24-6201
Christopher Jeorge Millican v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure hearsay search-warrant sixth-amendment testimonial-evidence
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Confrontation Clause allows the admission of testimonial documents created in response to a search warrant without direct confrontation of the declarant
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether the Confrontation Clause allows the admission at trial—without confrontation of the declarant —of documents created in response to a search warrant that are signed under penalty of perjury, that identify Petitioner as the suspect, that contain the same statement the declarant would make if called to testify, and that are used by the prosecution to identify Peti tioner as the person who committed the offense.
Docket Entries
2025-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025.
2025-01-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 27, 2025)
Attorneys
Christopher Millican
Kristi A. Hughes — Law Office of Kristi A. Hughes, Petitioner
Kristi A. Hughes — Law Office of Kristi A. Hughes, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent