No. 24-6211
Roderick Wayne Bell v. United States
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-law federal-statute gun-rights second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there is an obvious and irreconcilable clash between § 922(g)(1) and the rights protected by the Second Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
is: Whether there is an obvious and irreconci lable clash be tween § 922(g)(1) and the rights protected by the Second Amendment .
Docket Entries
2025-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2025.
2025-01-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2025)
Attorneys
Roderick Bell
Taylor Wills Edwards Brown — Federal Public Defender, N.D. Tex., Petitioner
Taylor Wills Edwards Brown — Federal Public Defender, N.D. Tex., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent