Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit improperly applied precedent and misinterpreted statutory immunity defenses in a manner conflicting with other Circuit Court decisions

1. Has the United States Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit entered a decision in conflict with the decision of Hughes v. United States 263 F.3D 272, 278 (3rd Cir.2001), which is the decision of another U.S. Court of Appeal on the same important matter, and reason for the U.S. Supreme Court to grant Writ of Certiorari pursuant to U.S. Supreme Court Rule 10 (a)(b)(c)? 2. Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit only state Baugh v, Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997), and Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 202 (5th Cir. 1983) and ignore the arguable legal points clearly defined in the Petitioners Appeal Brief that where nonfrivolous? 3. Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit use Willingham v. Morgan, 395 U.S. 402, 409 (1969) in their document filed on April 25th, 2024 to as a substitute for the averment of an official immunity defense and did Respondents Michelle Parham qualify for 28 U.S.C. 1442 (a) (1)? 4. Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit use Joiner v. United States, 955 F.3d 399, 403 (5th Cir. 2020, and Life Partners Inc. v. United States, 650 F.3d 1026, 1029 (5th Cir. 2011) correct in their statement on page 2 of