Did the lower courts violate the Estate of Alvin David Smith's constitutional rights under the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and did the actions of the Master in Chancery and Chancery Court of Delaware violate due process by improperly modifying a final order?

Did the lower courts Violate The Estate of Alvin David Smith's Fifth and Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 14 amendment as well as a violation of the laws of sucession title 12 as well as Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States ? Did the actions of the Master in Chancery and the Chancery Court of Delaware violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by modifying a final order outside of the permissible time frame without proper exceptions and by improperly handling estate administration issues ? A judgment may not be rendered in violation of constitutional protections. An order that exceeds the jurisdiction of the court is void, and can be attacked in any proceeding in any court where the validity of the judgment comes into issue. (See Rose v. Himely (1808) 4 Cranch 241,2 L ed 608; Pennoyer v. Neff (1877) 95 US 714,24 L ed 565; Thompson v. Whitman (1873) 18 Wall 457,211 ED 897; Windsor v. McVeigh (1876) 93 US 274,23 L ed 914; McDonald v. Mabee (1917) 243 US 90,37 Set 343, 61 L ed 608. Parties CARLA COWAN ("Appellant") was the plaintiff in the Court of Chancery action. II JAMES FURLOW ("Appellee") was the defendant in the Court of Chancery action. The Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware had jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of the underlying suit 20200695-SEM. TABLE OF CONTENT XII OPINIONS BELOW JURISDICTION XII CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS XII INVOLVED