No. 24-6220

John F. Policastro v. Nevada Employment Security Division, et al.

Lower Court: Nevada
Docketed: 2025-01-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law cares-act disability-rights due-process equal-protection nevada-constitution
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2025-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Nevada courts purposely ignore facts related to CARES Act emergency pandemic benefits fund improprieties by the State of Nevada?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

I. Did the Clark County District Court, the Court of Appeals of the State of Nevada and The Nevada Supreme Court purposely ignore the facts of this case due to the Petitioner revealing a huge system over-payments and other improprieties by the State of Nevada of the federal CARES Act emergency pandemic benefits funds? II. Whether the Petitioner, as a “disabled person ” as defined under Nevada Revised Statutes NRS 426.068 and 42 U.S. Code § 12102 is entitled to due process and equal protection under the CARES Act, Nevada Constitution and the U.S. Constitution? III. Does the decision of the Court of Appeals conflict with a prior decision of the Court of Appeals in Popal v. The State Emp ’t Sec. Div., No. 84291-COA (Nev. App. Oct. 20, 2022) and The Supreme Court Nevada in Anderson v. State, Empl. Sec. Div., 130 Nev. 294, 300, 324 P.3d 362, 365-366 [368] (2014)?

Docket Entries

2025-03-03
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2025.
2024-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2025)

Attorneys

John Policastro
John F. Policastro — Petitioner