No. 24-6221
Adaeze Nwosu v. Karla Smith, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection ex-parte-communication judicial-misconduct racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it is legal and/or constitutional for sitting judges to affirm illegal and unconstitutional ex-parte discussions of sitting judges with a white defendant, which were unlawfully conducted in order to dismiss the black plaintiffs claim and grant judgment in favor to the white defendant?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. Whether it is legal and/or constitutional for sitting judges to affirm illegal and unconstitutional ex-parte discussions of sitting judges with a white defendant, which were unlawfully conducted in order to dismiss the black plaintiffs claim and grant judgment in favor to the white defendant?
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2024-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2025)