Whether the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board erred in determining Petitioner lacked good cause for resignation and whether Respondents used misinformation to discourage case pursuit

1. Does the false information Petitioner received about the position with J. Paul Getty Trust explain why she declined the security officer position offered to her in September 2019 and chose to pursue the false position offered in August 2019? Whether Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board erred several times in deciding Petitioner was without good cause when she resigned from J. Paul Getty Trust. Whether Respondents used misinformation and intimidation to try to confuse and discourage Petitioner from further pursuing this case. Whether the errors, especially the error of rejecting CIV-100 and JUD-100, made by Respondents were intentional and meant to unnecessarily delay and harass Petitioner. Whether the business practices of the supposed council of Respondents and Respondents, which include the Judges, the clerks, and any individuals assigned to the lower courts, detailed in PLAINTIFF ’S OPENING BRIEF and PETITIONER ’S WRIT OF CERTIORARI, are fair, reasonable, and consistent with the guidelines set forth in various rules, California law, and Federal law.2. 3. 4. 5. Page 9 of 47 i; Rule 14. Content of a Petition Writ of Certiorari 1. (a) Page 9; Questions Presented for Review. (b) (i) Page 10; A List of All Parties. (Included in A List of All Proceedings) (iii) Pages 10; A List of All Proceedings. (c) Pages 10,11, and 12;