Whether Harris was twice put in jeopardy for one uninterrupted criminal episode under two separate statutes that punish the same conduct without a clear legislative intent

X The Double Jeopardy Cl&u^g of lAe f if 4-h Amendmenf of 4he jjfn'Ted Shies Cortsll-Miofl protvbihs mulKple puA ishmenH for 4he same offense / ui4hou4 a clear expression of (-egulafive m4en4. Af4er firing G Succession o-P buli-ek m4o a idle Vehicle beiAj occupied by Leanndl fc&bwson And eausin^ him serious physical Injviry. Harris.was convic4ed under 4wo se^rafe s4a4u4es 4ha4 punish ihe sane Conducf.' One of 4he convicled offenses Jots a&4 require proof of an ekmervf additional fac4 4f«v4 +he o4her does n&4, \Klas Harris 4wice pu+ w Jeopardy for one unuvkrruphed criminal episode 4ho4 Was a wlahtn of fu)o d>s4ine4 s4a4ulory a dear expression of legisMn/e infeni.or an n. Aransas G?As4ilu4ion Ar4. [A,f 20 mxrcocs U-S-C.A. Consf. Ar4. VI c|.3 ~ 4kc4 prohibHs a jud^menj from beinij valyf if live judge ujho pronounced 4he jutywnf dj noi foYe a lawfully prescribed oof in of office . The regular VCiXaftd 4he bench and a special jdd^-e was allegedly elecfed 4*6 fill 4he Vacancy. 6«*f he did no4 Take a valid oa4K of of Ace. tyier-e proceedings held by 4he special judj>e in 4haf courf null and Void? was {farns denied 4Ae ecjual profeef il'S-C. A. Coasf. Amend. § I-£^ uqI4 he (oA of ffa \gl\jO under m. il-S.C.A, -—— shafts fhdj 4he wrtf of habeas sWI no! I* Juip<ndeO[.J Rami pWcd junsoficliooa I issuer .« Kansas courfs, Bu| 4he Shfe Trial (ourI a/V Slale Supreme Couri re used to issue fhe u)nf. Has 4he Slade of Aryansas suspended 4he privilege of 4he u>ri4.Corpus ' A/spx f. m-/% Appx. S