No. 24-6238

In Re Daniel Felix

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: animal-rights constitutional-personhood due-process equal-protection hate-crime-classification religious-freedom
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2025-04-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether non-property animals possess constitutional rights as individual plaintiffs and victims of cruelty in United States courts

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. That Non-property Animals have a US Constitutional Right to be individual "stand alone" Plaintiffs and petitioners in Courts of the United States Of America and State Courts. 2. That Non-property Animals as "stand alone" Plaintiffs and as "stand alone victims" of acts of animal cruelty have at the very least rudimentary US Constitutional Rights such as Equal Protection Of Law, Due Process Of Law, Access To The Courts, protection from Cruel And Unusual Punishment, and have the Right to protections under the US Victim's Rights Act. 3. That "Caretakers" or anyone providing life giving support or support after death have the US Constitutional Right to bring lawsuits on behalf of the injured animals or deceased animals as "Next Friend". 4. That the United States Congress created a new legal "definition of beings" for non-property animals with the creation of the Federal Animal Cruelty Law that the Courts must consider as "persons" in the application of Federal And State Laws. 5. The Federal and State Governments are in violation of the US Constitutional Right to Religious Freedom by enforcing their "Only Humans Matter" religion on citizens that are of the religious belief that animals are the same as humans, feel and suffer the same as humans, have souls the same as humans, have lives equal to that of humans and enforcement of the "Only Humans Matter" religion causes loss of religious freedom, injures persons whose beliefs are contrary and is Cruel And Unusual Punishment for those who value animals the same as humans. 6. The Court violates the US Constitutional Right to Due Process Of Law with it's abuse of Rule 12 (b)(6) of the Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure and violates the US 2 Constitution by denying Equal Protection Of Law with manipulations of Due Process Of Law such as Qualified And Absolute Immunity. 7. Cats need to be added as a protected class under Hate Crime Laws and acts of cruelty to cats by CAT Haters must be designated as a "Hate Crime" listed under Hate Crime Laws.

Docket Entries

2025-04-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-01-22
Application (24A711) denied by The Chief Justice.
2025-01-13
Application (24A711) for injunctive relief, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2024-12-13
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2025)

Attorneys

Daniel Felix
Daniel Felix — Petitioner