No. 24-6241
Justin Michael Buehler v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure cross-examination evidence-limitation informant-testimony judicial-discretion witness-credibility
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court abuse its discretion by limiting the defendant's cross-examination of the key witness and informant's criminal history?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Did the District Court abuse it's discretion by limiting the defendant's cross examination of the key witness and informant's criminal history?
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-17
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent