Did the Court of Appeals err in its plain error review when it held that appellant had not suffered an effect on his substantial rights that may have affected the outcome of the trial when he was indicted and tried using an ex post facto change in the law?

I. Did the Court of Appeals err when it failed, to address the issues raised by the appellant after/ji.s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief and moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967)7 II. Did the Court of Appeals err in its plain error review tfhen it held that appellant had not suffered an effect on his substantial rights that may have affected the outcome of the trial when he was indicted and tried using.an ex post facto change in the lav;?