No. 24-6243
A. K. Anderson v. Miguel A. Cardona, Secretary of Education, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-exhaustion administrative-procedure-act circuit-conflict civil-rights driver's-license due-process
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit conflict with the Eighth Circuit's ruling regarding the timeliness and exhaustion of the petitioner's Administrative Procedure Act (APA) cause of action, and did the Ninth Circuit rule contrary to its own and the Supreme Court's previous decisions?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION PRSENTED FOR REVIEW. Did the Ninth Circuit conflict with a ruling from the Eighth Circuit as to whether his Appeal with the Department of Education should have proceeded, and also did the Ninth Circuit rule contrary to its own decisions, and the decisions of this Court? \ Petition for Writ of Certiorari Anderson v. Cardona 2
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-07
Waiver of Federal Respondents of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
2024-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2025)
Attorneys
Cardona, Sec. of Education
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Federal Respondents
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent