Did authorities violate the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments during a 'knock-and-talk' interrogation by entering a secured gate, demanding identification, entering a house without consent, and interrogating the petitioner outside counsel's presence?

Did authorities violate The Fourth, Fifth, andSixth Amendments to The United States Constitution when seeking to perform a "knockand-talk" interrogation by first calling the phone number posted at the motorized gated entrance, but after being refused, climbing through that secured gated entrance, and after searching the curtilage, encountering Petitioner, telling him that he could not refuse their presence under color of federal immigration law, thereby demanding his identification, leading authorities directly into Petitioner ’s house was interrogated and items were seized, although Petitioner refused to sighn a consent, and specifically invoked his right to counsel, then after leaving, summoning Petitioner to their office, and further interrogating him outside the presence of his attorney, previously requested.where Petitioner -i