No. 24-6246
Benny Roe Stewart v. Jim Salmonsen, Warden
IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection montana-statute sentencing-court subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Montana Statute M.C.A. (46-22-101) violates constitutional due process and equal protection when subject matter jurisdiction is challenged
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. The validity of Montana Statute M.C.A. (46-22-101) (1) and M.C.A. (46-22-101 (2) is drawn in question on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, or laws of the United States whenever lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is raised against the sentencing court, which violates: 2. Due Process of the law 3. Equal Protection of the law.
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2024-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2025)
Attorneys
Benny Roe Stewart
Benny Stewart — Petitioner