Darris Lamar Mull v. United States
Whether a lifetime federal firearm ban for felons violates a defendant's Second Amendment rights when the government cannot demonstrate a historical tradition of analogous laws
Was Mr. Mulls convictions of 922(g)(1) as a felon-in-possession of firearms violations of his Second Amendment Rights because: (A) A LIFETIME FEDERAL FIREARM BAN CANNOT INFRINGED UPON UNLESS; it is amended through the constitutional amendment process provided in (Y\ a.A'-v-e.r V of the constitution , txjVo '$>e.c,V (B) the government has never shown that PERMANENTLY disarming felons■> is supported by a historical tradition of analogous laws and (C) his predicate offenses (Forgery) are not offenses that are historically recogniz'ed for banning a citizens right to possess firearms?