No. 24-6264
Suresh Munshani v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the merger of a money laundering conspiracy conviction with a wire fraud conspiracy conviction requires dismissal of the money laundering charge
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. The following question is presented here. Does the merger of Petitioner’s money laundering conspiracy conviction with Petitioner’s wire fraud conspiracy conviction require dismissal of the money laundering conviction? The purpose of the wire fraud was to steal money. Petitioner was then charged with money laundering because the two perpetrators divided up the stolen money. 2. Did the Respondent’s Reply summation violate Due Process of Law, and deprive Petitioner of a fair trial?
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-17
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2025)
Attorneys
Suresh Munshani
Bernard Alan Seidler — B Alan Seidler, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent