No. 24-6269

Jean Jocelyn Merilien v. Andrew McFarlane, Warden

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2025-01-13
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: None
Latest Conference: 2025-03-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1* Xxd€L£ sU£i/B^fk c-tocafT < -QuttoM A-l/aicrai&dL Rjs/q_ Co &>)/£>} has no 11 ml-Cufu^j &P£l/n(L usVjL*r J biSfap &{co wrA Atihtiti iffl j-lmcly/ t)a&3 oJj£tizMk Ctocvfl noanf&f WzMz &u,Le& ~b* U CCoooedL Akts CdMr-f Prccedkrfi ktiConXS nA) Stick V:,t>M% jflfjAtS MfSr. filfLe60 0)&) Acd> 0sJ 3. de&Aj Jecs-lyM meoh^A'^ deak -PemMpCa&e. r#he$, *, re-ssr/d tsstne-o-P ncdUAtd. i/nfanhsice.', u>le-fke. c aa& -tj xA>kcdt c-X-ktit-hkjt MmiNoJl JiiStfcz. 99s-faon tol^naMs ’&dG£cxi/^, dp<x .Ujl mHeJL sAktc-s /hf/e^ls fi>r ia&ti£j^TJk Cfecuir xmfo^e. m f mProf^ andL tindtr# DU&£&t/)S<£>/>4&. C£jCT( firc/FTJL t S-fa,ndW i'kaSr &Q tiA^aX/CAJtiS AAls Co ur&S fa&£e£hx? cindl a£el&n<? ^ca>o Clwjrtlr Sk/lbs coie^J /£ d&rfeJl Wl#, a. CjD/f k/f&t-C &<n/ hlS moito/J P&fotiQ. -kkg. bTiddLSM&fli: cxnkl d>Mt£d tiiOxlls £gJ/£m of ktg-fyjQ ~ C0 OnfrtgBhg CtiOkiLck fle^ju P&ttkA/J&X /£PJ&L frosecti'te/C fP/M^anJ) ±0tiMD[pfr fW^ ProBectiU>n DfadeJl 4o a 3tfliy*l£cL C&i-J'Lo if-Jtr d&xxrk As (Xti(plc$. 'fkeM ixscloStir^ , doccjMtx^s +hq vJeAe, e^e dCcdk fe^^IAy cc&e fij/rfhCA* tip{J/?S&l£ aJ/mffe^fkdSr bji£ Crroc vooifid nof bc fid AJit\,c SfJPe ^PcCp^cb>sticG <gah Od kU pr OSCCtibtOd Slcbe £** £kty •fidUr*' c dfScbV(Xy Df £dm&~3c£d£A^AA foods, fir&sfo ec/jdhr/te, Akdt kyffaS^ *^&CCltici <&C-fA& <3° scanle. , aAd ikerfTf /> £L yh 'f/d k?(Mky Itickk Volik&k fknCnA't^Se)L( £ SkjMeJ? i n T (DS£CtJ4fy\r fYl {.Q/jcd eJ C&~ _ ^n4&r)4 :u>^J^JlY Ai/ffr&zR(?JD_ ^ fe£&^yiPA_ /lAPaIIistf/J S> /’rz/MP. g/Y^ M,r,hs)cCcciJ&' _ w . , MO^Cd^ — ZZal v Aa/ / <3-^i^, AX'^ y^ £AjSdLym^iM/(j 4-^-e , rtr/rfte. £>cjps?&^ / y^f"hfiaQ /3L-fMr<2@ . jfilYrJy /[ J/Uu^j)^ M<xl4e^ &DkPJsh tJJal *Hjp. firf/y <ns "bhe 4 T' y& if/id afk ’t'La. c^MeTSc a^je. _ \jl n fe&,ArJ _ "f/iuS c^/ro-f$<-'£&lJleS) f <P>^ArJty {/. /V\fy&yl^f)c Q_._4. > c cOndLe,. c r fV ) __bo~. cSssr^yik> vL -l$-l-QA&ce/}ce^ ^ +rfai_. Cerates rhz0<f$j:/W&/7'£ *.£ke. CAJ4X& c*jU/cM£_ pr£&££&&-& ___ .)Ui.a&..uMS> ^ 4J-fJ$>r4 pa kjl )(Zarp L/ar.ff a /rO flJce&dcs^^/// jjr i&Jb£*ud&jo^£jaj4 /UlW^cdctyidk£u . . . ^ Q,QjjkmQ. i SS £/£, a$r CeS tfLrfS Ifl/g. ypfUtZ /2frW &QnZP£ kr& KiAeJj/* Lnt. ?J^>s fmjkltel(WL b&t/Jl/fr/f/K a xl/T (//fifty. !A) 0(yJ, is. >i L; c a X4^S XU t/nef^A. .& oy/cf^) (/ A/AjRdMlfi'fkfc /id/r^<? •» li

Docket Entries

2025-03-24
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2025-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2024-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2025)

Attorneys

Jean J. Merilien
Jean J. Merilien — Petitioner