No. 24-6270
Timothy Edward Peterson v. James Salmonsen, Warden
IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection montana-statute sentencing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Montana Statute MCA (46-22-101) violates due process and equal protection when subject matter jurisdiction is challenged in sentencing
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. The validity of Montana Statute MCA (46-22-101 (1) and MCA (46-22-101) (2) is drawn in question under 28 U.S.C. § 1257(a) on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, or laws of the United States, whenever lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is raised against the sentencing court, which violates Due Process of the Law, and Equal Protection of the Law.
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2024-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2025)
Attorneys
Timothy E. Peterson
Timothy Peterson — Petitioner