Whether a Wisconsin Circuit Court Judge abused judicial discretion by preventing defense counsel from alleging potential evidence withholding and whether Brady v. Maryland principles were violated

1. Not since Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) has a case been so compelling and brought before the U.S. Supreme Court needing a federal court ruling, therefore, doesn't it make sense to make into a new federal law that civilians deserve the knowledge that police officers determining Probable Cause aren't themselves impaired as a novel federal legal precedent? 2. And speaking of Brady 1, whether a Wisconsin Circuit Court Judge completely abused it’s power telling a defense attorney that “But the implication is something was withheld from him, that I’m not going to allow that, some indication withholding of evidence here. . .But I just want to avoid some implication that somebody is withholding evidence here. ”, (R130:59-60) and whether he, and the Wisconsin Appellate Court, who completely ignored the Petitioner ’s Brady 2 claim in it’s Opinion/Decision (R131