No. 24-628
BNP Paribas SA, a French Corporation, et al. v. Entesar Osman Kashef, et al.
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the courts of appeals have discretion under Rule 23(f) to grant interlocutory review solely because a district court's class-certification order is manifestly erroneous.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the courts of appeals have discretion under Rule 23(f) to grant interlocutory review solely because a district court's class-certification order is manifestly erroneous
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-25
Reply of BNP Paribas SA, et al. submitted.
2025-02-25
Reply of petitioners BNP Paribas SA, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2025-02-06
Brief of Entesar Osman Kashef, et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-02-06
Brief of respondents Entesar Osman Kashef, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-02-05
Brief of Entesar Osman Kashef, et al. in opposition submitted.
2024-12-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 7, 2025.
2024-12-18
Motion of Entesar Osman Kashef, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2024-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 8, 2025 to February 7, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 8, 2025)
Attorneys
BNP Paribas SA, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Petitioner
Entesar Osman Kashef, et al.
Michael David Hausfeld — Hausfeld LLP, Respondent