Marilyn Tillman-Conerly v. Office of Personnel Management, et al.
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in applying Knick v. Township of Scott and abused its discretion in finding that alternative service during the COVID-19 pandemic was insufficient
1) WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Erred in Finding that the case Knick v. Township of Scott Pa. does not apply in this case at hand? 2) Whether the Ninth Circuit Court abused its discretion by finding and deciding that District Court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Plaintiff ’ /Appellant ’s/Petitioner ’s/Tillman-Conerly ’s for failure to effect timely service of summons and complaint on Respondents when Petitioner ’s Process Server followed the necessary alternative service procedure instructed by ’/ Respondents ’ office of general counsel gave because of the Covid 19 pandemic (Corona Virus) which caused Defendants ’/Appellees ’/Respondents ’ agency to be closed without a date that they would be reopened? 3) Whether Petitioner ’s Process Server did-effect timely serve of summons and complaint on when the Process Server followed the necessary alternative service procedure instructed by Defendants ’/Appellee ’s/Respondent ’s office of general counsel gave because of the uncontrollable covid 19 pandemic (Corona Virus) which caused defendants ’ agency to be closed without a date that they would be reopened? 4) Whether did show good cause for failure to serve by Plaintiff ’s/Appellant ’s/Petitioner ’s Process Server not following the previous usual procedure, Plaintiff's/ Appellee ’s/Petitioner ’s Process Server did-effect .timely serve .of summons .and complaint on defendants when the Process Server followed the necessary alternative service procedure instructed by defendants ’ office of general counsel gave because ofthe uncontrollable covid 19 .pandemic .(.Corona Virus.) which caused defendants ’ agency to be closed without a date they would be reopened? 5) Whether the Ninth Circuit Court abused its discretion by finding and deciding .that the District Court did abuse its .discretion by rejecting Plaintiff s/Appellant ’s/Tillman-Conerly ’s contention that the District Court was biased against her whereby that District Court found as being meritless, and the District was well aware of the affect that the Corona Virus .had on the service process of the Judicial System? • « Ji