No. 24-6291
Jonathan Garduno v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: None
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN DISMISSING GARDUNO’S APPEAL . II. WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN AFFIRM ING THE DISTRICT COURT ’S DENIALS OF GARDUNO’S OBJECTION REGARDING THE DISPARITY OF SENTENCES BY DISMISSING GARDUNO’S APPEAL . III. WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN AFFIRM ING GARDUNO ’S SENTENCE WHERE GARDUNO ’S SENTENCE WAS UNREASONABLE IN LIGHT OF THE STATUTORY SENTENCING FACTORS LISTED IN 18 U.S.C. §3553(A) -(F) AND PRINCIPLES APPLIED BY THE ADVISORY FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES BY DISMISSING GARDUNO’S APPEAL .
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-22
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2025)
Attorneys
Jonathan Garduno
David Jonathon Joffe — Joffe Law, P.A., Petitioner
David Jonathon Joffe — Joffe Law, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent