Whether a federal court can provide relief to a US citizen alleging deprivation of a fair and impartial tribunal through California state court's summary judgment mechanism in violation of the 14th Amendment

It is well known that US has the fairest if not the perfect jury trial system. California civil system has motion for summary judgment (MSJ) to prevent jury trial for frivolous case. But California judges and justices took advantage of the low visibility of a case when the party is neither a celebrity nor a rich person and utilized this summary judgment mechanism to deprive the party of a fair and impartial jury tribunal by giving intentionally bad faith opinion for MSJ which intentionally disregarded well-established general principle of law and created new law on the fly. When California justices intentionally disregard well-established general principle of law and create new law on the fly, there is no way for a party to win a motion of MSJ no matter how strong his case is unless the justices want him to win. So the intentionally wronged party loses his chance to a fair and impartial jury trial. It thus violated the 14th Amendment which states no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This includes the right to a fair and impartial tribunal. When this happens, can a US citizen get help from federal court to preserve his US Constitution right to a fair and impartial tribunal which the 14th Amendment endows? II