Whether the Panel's decision conflicted with Rehaif v. United States by affirming a conviction without evidence that the defendant knew a deferred judgment qualified as a 'conviction' for federal firearms restrictions

1. Whether, in reviewing Mr. Fisher’s conviction for possession of ammunition as a convicted felon under 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 924 (a)(2), the Panel’s decision conflicted with Reha if v. United States , Rehaif v. United States , 588 U.S. 225 (2019) since it affirmed without any evidence in the record to show that Mr. Fisher knew a deferred judgment qualified as a “conviction” for purposes of the federal firearms and ammunition restriction? ii PARTIES Anthony Fisher is the Petitioner; he was the Defendant -Appellant below before the 8th Circuit. The United States of America is the responden t and was the Plaintiff -Appellee below.