Question not identified.

1. Did the Gourt violate defendant rights vhen the Gourt granted money to subpoena, in order to prqnare a defense that vas not. 2. Did the Cburt violate defendants rights vhen appellate Cburt oral argument S.Ct rule 137 attorney signature veil grounded in fact vas not upheld shew unreasonable assistance ? 3. Did the Cburt violate defendants rights vhen post conviction counsel failure to adept proportianate penalty argument shewing reasonable probability of impairment? < see People v Estrada IL 2024 IL app <lst> 230029 u < see > Andersen v Gipscn 902 F.3d 1126, 1135 ( 9th Cir ) 4. Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen the judge denied continuance motion ? 5. Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen the states attorney deterred ley witnesses such as Troy Perkins with another case ? 6. Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen they denied the functional equivalent of a juvenile? 7. Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen they denied that his sentence violated the proportional penalty clause ? 8. Did tie Gourt violate defendants rights vhen defendants culpability and maturity level vas lessened due to a train tumor ?. 9. Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen defendant supplemented original post conviction petition with an aeapplied claim ? < see People v Clark 2023 10. Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen P.S.I. report was based on juvenile record ? IL Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen the defendant received a de facto life sentence equivalent to life and the death penalty ? 12. Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen appellate Gourt did not accqpt reconsideration motion for proportionate penalty by trial counsel attatidnad to original post conviction petition ? 13. Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen the record at sentence vas premature ? 14. Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen denying unreasonable assistance of counsel vhen counsel failed to adept 2019 motion ? 15. Did the Gourt violate defendants rights vhen they did not consider his childhood upbringing ? < see People v Maldonado > 16. Did tine Cburt violate defendants rigjnts vten the incaiplete development of no expect was railed to trial or santercirg. < see Qdle v Woodford 238 F.3d 1084, 1089-90 ( 9th Cir ) > 17. Did the Court violate defendants rigjnts vten they denied successive post conviction leading than tack to 2019 original filing ? 18. Did the Cburt violate defendants rigjnts vten he outlined all his original characteristics ? 19. Did the Cburt violate defendants rigjits vten defendant did receive a retrospect hearirg due to brain surgery < see Vteat v Thigpen 793 F.2d 621, 631(5th Cir 1986) 20. Did the Cburt violate the defendants rigjnts vten po6t conviction counsel signed off on post violation 651 (c) without adopting ? 21. Did the Cburt violate defendants rigjnts vten other crimes were brougjnt in, specifically crimes of defendants father and brother that still did rot ccnplete record ? 22. Did the Gcurt violate defendants rigjnts vten the firearm expert mentioned that there was no way to tell if bullet in tine victims car came frcm defendant ? 23. Did tine Gourt violate defendants rigjits vten post conviction counsel did not file notice of appeal on second stage denial issues, as well as appellate counsels ineffectiveness ? 24. Did tine Cburt violate defendants rigjnts vten tine State committed prosecutorial misconduct or prosecutorial vindictiveness ? 25. Did the Cburt violate defendants rigjnts vten the State claimed remoteness of time against Lonnie Thcmas ? < see People v Barnes 2017 IL app (1st) 143903 > 26. Did tine Cburt violate defendants rigjnts vten tine appellate Cburt said that Mr. Berkuns statement was neutral ? * r 1 4