No. 24-6307
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-duty due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus judicial-review subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
DOES THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM OWE MR.GREGORY
AND THE UNITED STATES CONST A DUTY UNDER ARTICLE 1 SECTION III
E/TOO HAD REVIEW AND REACH THE MERITS OF HIS HIS ISSUE HE RAISED
IN HIS 28 USC 2255 PETITION IN ISSUE [26] THAT THE UNITE STATES
LACKED SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE HIM
"THE ANWSER IS YES !!!"
DOES THE UNITED STATES HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
TO PROSECUTE HIM
"THE ANWSER IS NO"!
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States federal court system has a constitutional duty to review and reach the merits of a subject matter jurisdiction challenge in a 28 USC 2255 petition
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-23
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-12
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2025)
Attorneys
Bryan Lee Gregory
Bryan Lee Gregory — Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent