Whether the United States federal court system has a constitutional duty to review and reach the merits of a subject matter jurisdiction challenge in a 28 USC 2255 petition

-ONE DOES THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM OWE MR.GREGORY AND THE UNITED STATES CONST A DUTY UNDER ARTICLE 1 SECTION III E/TOO HAD REVIEW AND REACH THE MERITS OF HIS HIS ISSUE HE RAISED IN HIS 28 USC 2255 PETITION IN ISSUE [26] THAT THE UNITE STATES LACKED SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE HIM "THE ANWSER IS YES !!!" QUESTION -TWO DOES THE UNITED STATES HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE HIM "THE ANWSER IS NO"! r.L. PARTIES ENVOLVED (1) . The United States Supreme Court, (2) . The 8th Circuit court of Appeals, (3) . Judge Steven Bough Distrcit judge of the Southern ’.Divison of Missouri.Western Dist ’prst , CONTENTSPage (1) . Parties envolved (2) . Questions presented (3) Jurisdictional statement. (4) . Reasons for granting writ of mandamus (5) . Question -one (6) . Question -two ,(7). Relif sought2 3-4 5-7 9-10 11-25 25-26 JURISDICTION STATEMENT The United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 23 USC 1651 (A). The petitioner has noother legal remedy and the law and facts are in his favor, The United States Supreme Court held in CHENEY VS US DIST COURT 524 US 376 (2007). Under 1651 (a) The law does not put litigants impossible positions of (1) Having to exhust alterante remdies before petition at the earlist possiability to aviod laches. The Unite States Supreme Court held in IN RE CHICAGO, ROCK ILAND & P.R.CO. 255 US 273 (1921). A writ of of prhibition to prevent lower court from wrorogfully assuming jurisof party of a causa of the same collective matter arrxsing petition well ordinary granted to one who at the outset objected objected to the jurisdiction has preserved his right by appropriate procedure and has no other remedy. Mr.Gregory raised this subject jurisdiction matter issue in his28 USC "diction 28 USC 2255 petition in issue [25!], Judge Steven Bough ruled that that Mr, Gregory waived his right to challenge this issue , Mote: 'the government did not raise this defense and as a matter of law. This issue can not be waived and a court must consider it’s own jurisdiction. The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals refuse to address this issue . Mr.Gregory raised this subject matter in Writ of Certiorari 23-7031 of the denial of his 28 USC 2255, and the denial of his rule 60-R petition .-23'-7032 Mr,Gregory preserved this subject matter jurisdiction issue in his 28 USC 2255, and judge Steven Bough unlawfully ruled that Mr.Gregory waived his right to raised this claim even though jursdiction of the court can not be waived and the 8th Circuit Appeallant Court and teh United States Supreme Court has neglected it’s own duty by 3 reaching the. merits of this subject matter jurisdiction issue and failed to address even though Judge Steven unlawfully ruled that Hr.Gregory waived his right to challenge this issue. This clear error the Oth Circuit Court of Appeals and the on Judge Steven Rough United States Supreme Court is supportive evidence of the bias and corruption in the. United States federal Court System. Mr.Gregory has never been provided his one fair unpartial review of this issue. The facts can not he disputed and the law is in his favor and he is entitle for this court to issue a writ of mandamus to vacate and 6:17-cr-3044 dismiss the lindictment under Mr.Gregory raised this issue as mandated by 28 USC 2255, Judge Steven Bough ruled that Mr.Gregory waived his right to challenge this Subject Matter Jurisdiction'Defect in is sue[2-5] of Appeals ..refusedto address it, then the United States States to address it in the 2255 case in 32-7031 And the rule 60-b petition, under case no 23-7032. Mr.Gregory has no other legal remedy or access to court Steven Rough refuses to' address this issue, and reach the merits of this arguement and the 8th Circuit Court refuses to follow the law and the United States has refused to follow the law itself and has completly failed its duty to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America'and the United States Supreme Court has a Const