Whether the lower court erred in denying a finding of 'extraordinary and compelling' under U.S. Sentencing Guideline § 1B1.13(b)(6) and in assessing direct harm under the 8th Amendment for sentence reduction

1) As applied to Acquitted Conduct, whether the lower court erredin improperly denying a finding of "extraordinary and compelling" under U.S. Sentencing Guideline (USSG) § 1B1.13(b)(6) or, in the alternative, USSG § 1B1.13(b) (5). 2) Whether the lower court erred in its' assessment of direct harm to Petitioner and others through deliberate indifference to adequate medical care as protected under the 8th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and as may be considered for a reduction in sentence pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guideline § 1B1.13(b)(5) . 3) Whether the Petitioner was unfairly prejudiced by false and unsupported claims ab initio, thereby depriving Petitioner of a fair and impartial assessment of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors as they relate to a reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) . i.