No. 24-6312
IFP
Tags: crime-of-violence criminal-law hobbs-act sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation united-states-v-taylor
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether “Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A), a question left open after” United States v. Taylor , 596 U.S. 845 (2022). United States v. Stoney , 62 F.4th 108, 113 (3d Cir. 2023). This question is raised in the pending petition for certiorari filed in Barrett v. United States , No. 24-5774 before this Court.
Docket Entries
2025-05-19
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
2025-04-30
Reply of Tisheem Rich submitted.
2025-04-30
Reply of petitioner Tisheem Rich filed. (Distributed)
2025-04-16
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-04-16
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-03-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 16, 2025.
2025-03-03
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-03-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 17, 2025 to April 16, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-02-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 17, 2025.
2025-02-06
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-02-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 14, 2025 to March 17, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2025)
Attorneys
Tisheem Rich
Donna R. Newman — Law Office of Donna R. Newman, PA, Petitioner
Donna R. Newman — Law Office of Donna R. Newman, PA, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent