No. 24-6316
Antonio Ulises Barrera-Mackorty v. United States
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law due-process immigration-law naturalization statutory-interpretation vagueness-doctrine
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Question No. 15 on the naturalization application (N-400), when considered in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 1425, void for vagueness and thus a violation of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Is Question No. 15 on the naturalization application (N-400), when considered in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 1425 , void for vaguene ss and thus a violation of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution? i
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2024-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2025)
2024-11-05
Application (24A444) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 26, 2024.
2024-10-24
Application (24A444) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 27, 2024 to December 26, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Antonio Ulises Barrera Mackorty
Callie Glanton Steele — Law Offices of Callie Glanton Steele, Petitioner
Callie Glanton Steele — Law Offices of Callie Glanton Steele, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent