When a law is originally motivated by racial animus, must a court consider its racist origins when deciding whether it violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment under the framework established by Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, 429 U.S. 252 (1977), where it has been reenacted without substantive deliberation or amendment?

When a law is originally motivated by racial animus, must a court consider its racist origins when deciding whether it violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment under the framework established by Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropo litan Housing Development Corporation , 429 U.S. 252 (1977) , where it has been reenacted without substantive deliberation or amendment ?