Whether the Circuit Courts' three-judge panel created a conflict of grave importance by denying petitioner's en banc rehearing and potentially infringing upon the petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury through an Alford plea conviction enhancement

1* The Circuit Courts Three ^udgehnel, crewed a conflict ofgrave importance warmt!n£ this court ’s vihtn It dented petitioner's (notm hr rehe&tf/men banCj and cited that the petition for reheartnqen Sane Wfls Ci rcokltd h the Pul I co urt, ye t never stated u//i/ the petition Mas be!n$ denied? 3. bid the eircuii Courtis threejod^e panel Infringe upon the denk / of-petitioner's sixth amendment right to A trialbyjury> Petitioner to collateral Consequence^ in accepting the trial Courtis use ofpeti tioner's 3010 "Alford Pleneonvktidn^ to enhance and sentence petitioner ns alicareer offender? adverse to this courts rutinq in StiBPM \i, uidiTEbsr/rres tiHt U&* 13 (OJOOB) ?