No. 24-6353

Jonathan Tarek Nassar v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-01-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: None
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QUESTI ONS PRESENTED FOR REVI EW I. Do the fatal deviances from Rule 11 in this case–that is, the District Court’s abject failure to comply with nearly every requirement of Rule 11--demand a new re-arrai gnment? See FED. R. CRIM . P. 1 1. II.Was Mr. Nassar’s plea of guilty knowing and voluntary? Was Mr. Nassar’s decision to plead guilty knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made when he was grossly misinformed about the risks attendant to going to trial? ii

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-23
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 20, 2025)

Attorneys

Jonathan Nassar
Amy Ruth BlalockBlalock Law Firm, Petitioner
Amy Ruth BlalockBlalock Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent