I. Whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment prohibits the introduction and use of statements made by a non-testifying accomplice which directly implicate the accused, and which are relied on by the prosecution, for the truth of the matter asserted, during its case-in-chief and summation?

II. Are out-of-court statements of a non-testifying accomplice, which directly and intentionally implicate the accused, "testimonial" if the prosecution references and relies on the statement, for the truth of the matter asserted, during its case-in-chief and summation?

Whether the Confrontation Clause prohibits the introduction of non-testifying accomplice statements that directly implicate the accused