The Petitioner's capital murder trial was held in this facility:
The Supreme Courts of Oregon and Washington held this is inherently prejudicial and erodes the presumption of innocence. Oregon v. Cavan, 337 Ore. 433, 98 P.3d 381 (Or. 2004); Washington v. Jaime, 168 Wn2d 857, 233 P.3d 554 (Wash. 2010). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, with one judge dissenting, disagreed and reversed the unanimous lower court of appeals.
Was the Petitioner's right to the presumption of innocence and to due process violated when the Petitioner's capital murder trial was conducted in this jail facility?

Was the Petitioner's right to the presumption of innocence and to due process violated when the Petitioner's capital murder trial was conducted in this jail facility?